GHSA-85x2-q946-cp5h - Nodemailer: A ">" inside a quoted local part ends an angle-addr early in addressparser, delivering to a domain the header does not name
### Vulnerability summary
addressparser ends an angle-addr at the first `>` it sees, including one inside a quoted local part, a comment or a domain literal. The domain is then read off the text in front of that `>`. `<"a@evil.com>"@good.com>` is the mailbox `"a@evil.com>"@good.com` under RFC 5322, and Nodemailer read it as an address at `evil.com`. The unbracketed spelling of the same value was already read correctly. Affected: 3.0.0 through 10.1.3.
### Attacker capabilities
The attacker controls the text of a recipient or sender address that an application passes to Nodemailer, for example a To value entered in a contact or invite form, or the header of an inbound message parsed with mailparser. No access to the application, its configuration or its credentials is needed. The value is a syntactically valid RFC 5322 address that conformant parsers accept without defects.
### Realistic exploitation scenario
An application lets users send invitations or notifications only to addresses at an allowed domain and validates the submitted value with a conformant parser or by checking its domain. The attacker submits `<"a@evil.com>"@good.com>`, which validates as a `good.com` mailbox. Nodemailer then parses the same value, issues `RCPT TO:<"\"a"@evil.com>` and the message, with whatever content the application puts into it, is delivered to the attacker's domain. The security boundary crossed is the application's recipient allow list. In the inbound direction, mailparser reports a different address than a conformant reader of the same header, so a display or policy layer built on the two disagrees.
### Proof of concept
```js
const addressparser = require('nodemailer/lib/addressparser');
console.log(addressparser("<\"a@evil.com>\"@good.com>"));
// [ { address: '"a@evil.com', name: '@good.com>' } ]
```
Python's `email._header_value_parser.get_address_list` reads the same value as `"a@evil.com>"@good.com`, with no defects reported.
The envelope a message gets is built
MEDIUM
Severity & confidence
Source severitymedium
Platform severitymedium
Confidencemedium
Exploitationunknown
CVSS6.5
Affected
Vendorsnodemailer
Productsnodemailer
Reporting sources (1)
GitHub Security Advisories
Timeline & provenance
Published2026-10-23T21:51:18
Last updated2026-10-27T18:57:28
Ingested2026-10-23T22:03:29
FreshnessNEAR-REAL-TIME
Threat typeadvisory
Recommended action
Review the advisory and upgrade affected packages to the first patched version.
Next steps
- Identify affected systems in your environment.
- Apply the vendor patch or mitigation guidance.
- Review logs for indicators described in the advisory.
- Follow the affected vendor/product to track updates.
Confidence explanation
Reported by a single or secondary source; treat as indicative, verify before acting.
Source type: vendor ยท Original: GitHub Security Advisories